Say the word “journalist” in our loud and online culture, and most people may think about the national coverage — especially of politics — that they see in their social media feeds or on national cable.
But anyone who cares about division in our country shouldn’t forget local journalists. These people who live in the communities they serve cover what’s happening in local governments, among local businesses, the art scene and among neighbors — news that affects people deeply and daily.
Perhaps that’s why local news remains more trusted than national. But local news is challenged. “News deserts” are multiplying, and the workforce that remains is stretched thin.
Those who care about overcoming division — whether social science researchers or civil society leaders — have a lot to gain from exploring how their work might help dedicated local journalists across the country. We’ve seen it up close in our nonprofit programming for news leaders — and we’ve seen how it can improve the work of researchers and bridge-builders, too.
But don’t take our word for it. Here, we’ve gathered reflections from researchers in social science who have attended recent API Local News Summits, where they had the chance to interact with and explore how their work helps — and can be improved by insights from — local journalism.
- Why conversations with news leaders are key to effective research recommendations. Political scientist Yanna Krupnikov reflects on how hearing the resource challenges and self-critique of their work can inform the focus and communication of research findings to local journalists.
- Connecting with newsrooms can lead to collaborative projects that disrupt polarization. Kate Carney of the polarization research nonprofit More in Common reflects on local media as a “pillar of community life” and how connecting further with the field has sparked collaboration with local media.
- Bring together social researchers and news leaders to promote innovative community engagement. Social psychologist Andrew Abeyta reflects on how his research may have more local applications than he previously imagined and how local media’s innovations in community engagement might inspire community-engaged research as well.
The authors for this collection are “non-news” experts who attended our API Local News Summits, where tapping ideas outside of journalism to solve news challenges is a key element. These essays were commissioned ahead of a report on how API and other journalism support organizations are learning to bring journalists and non-news experts together in fruitful exchanges.
API is also involved in efforts to close the gaps between news leaders and researchers already studying media. We welcome opportunities to help make research more practical and useful for busy news leaders seeking to improve their local journalism and their local communities.
If you are interested in learning more about any of this work, please email Kevin Loker and Sam Ragland at hello@pressintitute.org.
Share with your network
- Pluralism and polarization: The value of research for local journalism
- Why conversations with news leaders can help researchers make more effective recommendations
- Connecting with newsrooms can lead to collaborative projects that disrupt polarization
- Bring together social researchers and news leaders to promote innovative community engagement
You also might be interested in:
What if we started looking at our output as a product, not a service? Too often, we think "product" means a fancy app or a new website. But product isn’t about tech. It’s about intention.
Reaching younger audiences has long been a challenge for media organizations. As platforms evolve, trust in news shifts and news avoidance grows, it can feel especially difficult to connect with and serve multigenerational audiences in an authentic and sustainable way. How can news leaders do their part to represent and include community perspectives from members of different age groups?
For us, we knew one of our biggest hurdles to success would be challenging the assumptions, both spoken and unspoken, we held for others. Here’s what we’ve learned over the past three years of gathering multigenerational problem-solvers.
