Most publishers at our summit said they track all the typical content metrics when measuring the reach of sponsored content — views, unique visitors, time spent, etc.
Most also share these metrics with sponsors but guarantee little or no specific results. Publishers that maintain more control over the content seemed to feel more comfortable guaranteeing some performance results.
The most-common metrics to prioritize are impressions and engagement (measured both in time or in social sharing).
The Minneapolis Star Tribune plugs in other advanced data services to track the demographics of sponsored content readers and to measure offline actions, such as purchases that they make after reading the content.
There’s room for improvement here. Many at our summit noted metrics they would like to be able to track and to show sponsors in the future, including reading completion rates, offline behavior or purchases after viewing, and social media data to know how the readers are connected to the sponsor via those networks.
Share with your network
Understanding the rise of sponsored content
You also might be interested in:
We gathered news leaders and non-news experts to discuss what it looks like to build sustainable youth engagement efforts into their coverage and fundraising. We asked four summit participants to share more about the ways they are funding experiments with youth engagement in their communities.
The study’s findings likely align with news engagement behavior you’re already noticing, but the data across age groups shows these shifts cannot be written off as a passing trend that younger generations will age out of. Here are four key takeaways and what they mean for local news.
This report draws on a nationally representative survey of teens ages 13–17 and adults 18 and older, providing one of the most comprehensive, generationally comparative looks at how Americans navigate an increasingly complex news, information and media ecosystem.
